�Consumers with hearing departure might think they ar saving significantly more by purchasing o'er the-counter listening aids, but they most likely testament be disappointed - or could be taking risks - when purchasing such aids, according to MSU research.
Professor Jerry Punch of the Department of Communicative Sciences and Disorders and Susanna Love Callaway, a womb-to-tomb education alumnus and international student from Denmark, published their study on over-the-counter hearing acquired immune deficiency syndrome in a recent military issue of the American Journal of Audiology.
Through her work as a educatee in Punch's two online courses, Callaway began to wonder around the high cost variability of hearing aids and asked Punch to counsel her on a electric potential project. Specifically, do hearing aids experience to be expensive to work from a strictly technical standpoint? Punch and Callaway set out to find the answer by subjecting 11 over-the-counter audience aids to the like test protocol as traditional hearing acquired immune deficiency syndrome.
Most consumers do non have or have only partial policy coverage for hearing aIDS, leading to out-of-pocket expenses ranging from hundreds to thousands of dollars. Low-cost options ar typically marketed on the Internet and in mail order magazines as listening devices - often for razz watchers or deer hunters.
"These affordable amplifying devices can appear tempting to individuals with hearing impairment because of the pregnant cost differences," Punch aforementioned. "But our research ground that the low-cost aIDS generally don't meet the fitting requirements to facilitate a hearing-impaired person and could potentially damage a person's audience."
The enquiry is important to consumers, Callaway aforesaid. "Aside from being of extremely poor quality, very low-cost hearing aids - those under $100 - have the potential to damage your hearing because they send very brassy sounds into the capitulum. The study's mid-range audience aids ($100-500) were of higher calibre and were not considered a safety hazard."
The authors state in their article that aids costing $100 to $500 oftentimes control the amount of sound sent into the ear better, but without a precise and knowledge-based fitting of the twist by an audiologist, consumers can require to see hit-or-miss success, Punch aforesaid. "Based on the research, the best advice for consumers is to peach to an audiologist. Because hearing acquired immune deficiency syndrome have complex technical features, they pauperism to be fitted and customized to the single."
The study measured how well the electronic features of the devices could compensate for commonly occurring types of hearing loss, employing methods that audiologists use to fit conventional hearing aIDS - a process audiologists call normative fitting. Specifically, the researchers found that only a few of the aIDS they studied met the basic accommodation requirements, and, for the few that did, that was on-key only for a specific degree of hearing red.
"Currently, more than 32 million people have a hearing deterioration, yet alone about 25 percent of those employment hearing aIDS," Punch aforementioned. "Meanwhile, the aging population is growing - and hearing red ink becomes more common as we become older."
Although the Food and Drug Administration formally regulates audition aids, those regulations ar not implemented for low-cost amplifying devices that are sold through mail ordination and on the Internet, Punch aforesaid. He thinks that people with listening loss should have more than information or so these devices.
The research was funded by the Oticon Foundation, and equipment was provided by Frye Electronics of Oregon for the duration of report.
Callaway is first author on the paper, which was character of her master's thesis for her degree in audiology at the University of Copenhagen. She is currently complemental the requirements for a doctorate degree at Western Michigan University.
Michigan State University
More info
